Bad Art Reddit. occasionally, bad art is easy to spot. if reddit were a museum, the wall texts would take up more space than the art, the visitors would talk too loudly, and the curation would be a disaster. The website, after all, is known for its eclectic content, diy feel, and rambling discussions led by a cultish user base. writers in galleries with a piece to file soon after are forever finding something they didn’t see initially, and one definition of an art critic. It aims to answer questions like, “why is some art bad whole other art hangs gloriously in the national gallery / why is one person’s pretty landscape another person’s epitome of kitsch?” do you think you might have some negativity towards your art, on account of feeling like its all you can do as a hobby? telling someone to never make art again is just such a huge asshole thing to say to someone no matter how bad their art. Take the famously botched restoration of elías garcía martínez’s ecco. Even to an individual, by one.
from www.reddit.com
It aims to answer questions like, “why is some art bad whole other art hangs gloriously in the national gallery / why is one person’s pretty landscape another person’s epitome of kitsch?” telling someone to never make art again is just such a huge asshole thing to say to someone no matter how bad their art. if reddit were a museum, the wall texts would take up more space than the art, the visitors would talk too loudly, and the curation would be a disaster. do you think you might have some negativity towards your art, on account of feeling like its all you can do as a hobby? The website, after all, is known for its eclectic content, diy feel, and rambling discussions led by a cultish user base. Even to an individual, by one. writers in galleries with a piece to file soon after are forever finding something they didn’t see initially, and one definition of an art critic. occasionally, bad art is easy to spot. Take the famously botched restoration of elías garcía martínez’s ecco.
Bad art r/BadArt
Bad Art Reddit if reddit were a museum, the wall texts would take up more space than the art, the visitors would talk too loudly, and the curation would be a disaster. The website, after all, is known for its eclectic content, diy feel, and rambling discussions led by a cultish user base. do you think you might have some negativity towards your art, on account of feeling like its all you can do as a hobby? It aims to answer questions like, “why is some art bad whole other art hangs gloriously in the national gallery / why is one person’s pretty landscape another person’s epitome of kitsch?” Even to an individual, by one. occasionally, bad art is easy to spot. Take the famously botched restoration of elías garcía martínez’s ecco. writers in galleries with a piece to file soon after are forever finding something they didn’t see initially, and one definition of an art critic. if reddit were a museum, the wall texts would take up more space than the art, the visitors would talk too loudly, and the curation would be a disaster. telling someone to never make art again is just such a huge asshole thing to say to someone no matter how bad their art.
